Skip to main content

Review of Sanju

Sanju (2018) Review – A Good Film, Without Conviction

Sanju (2018): A Good Film, Without Conviction

Third good movie in a row in 2018! But I call Sanju a good movie without conviction.

It’s been a week since I saw Sanju — twice — and I’ve been grappling with myself over how this film should be rated. While sipping ginger-laced chai on my balcony, it finally dawned on me why I felt so conflicted.

This is a film that wants to move you, inspire you, and absolve its protagonist — and it mostly succeeds. But it does so by sanding down edges that perhaps should have remained rough.

The Problems Are Real

To begin with, the movie has many flaws — and they are not small ones.

  • There are very few scenes where Ranbir Kapoor actually looks or acts like Sanjay Dutt. The rest is filled in generously by our imagination.
  • The make-up used to age Sanju is unintentionally comic. That’s what happens when prosthetics are overworked.
  • The editing feels shoddy in parts, especially when emotional beats are rushed.
  • Winnie the ice babe suddenly turns into Winnie the weeper — with no believable transition. Come on, don’t take us for granted.
  • While I understand Hirani’s trademark humour — lightening serious situations — the Boman Irani dead-body scene crosses a line. The slapstick background score only makes it worse.
  • This story unfolds in the 80s and 90s, not the 50s and 60s. The costume design feels oddly dated, as though the period itself wasn’t trusted enough to speak.

Sorry, Mr. Hirani. I had to point these out.

So Why Does It Still Work?

Despite these shortcomings, I will still label Sanju a good film — just not a brilliant one.

At a broad level, it’s a classic fighting-all-odds story, and those are inherently inspirational. Indian cinema thrives on redemption arcs, and this one is tailor-made for audience empathy.

At a more personal level, each one of us connects with Sanjay Dutt differently.

For a teenager, it’s Munnabhai. For the twenty-somethings, it’s Vaastav. Rewind further and you hit Khalnayak, Saajan, Rocky.

We all “know” this bloke — or think we do. Naturally, we want to know what really happened. That curiosity alone hooks the audience.

The Emotional Formula

On another plane, the film tugs at two deeply effective emotional threads: the father-son relationship, and the unwavering loyalty of a friend.

That’s the formula. And it’s a winning one.

But formulas also simplify. And simplification is where Sanju begins to feel safe instead of searching.

The Final Question

I often wonder how someone with no prior emotional relationship to Sanjay Dutt would react to this film.

Someone who hasn’t grown up watching his films. Someone without nostalgia. Someone without context.

Know anyone like that?

That, perhaps, is the real test of this movie.

Comments

PRM said…
Very concise and nicely written. I think the pathetic “whitewashing” of Sanjay Dutt’s life By using a “romantic” hero does not do well for the authenticity.

The mainstream movies already get a lot of reviews. Can you start reviewing some off the beat movies too?

- Your continued reader

Popular posts from this blog

Nuggets of Sholay: One - Oont Pahad Ke Neeche

Nuggets of Sholay #1: One Oont Pahad Ke Neeche Nuggets of Sholay #1: One Oont Pahad Ke Neeche (ओँट पहाड़ के नीचे) I must confess, starting this series of Nuggets of Sholay has been immensely joyful. Every line I researched, every scene I analyzed, brought me closer to the genius of Salim–Javed. Muhavra: One Oont Pahad Ke Neeche (ओँट पहाड़ के नीचे) This proverb literally means “a camel under a mountain,” describing something impossible or absurd. In Sholay , this phrase was delivered with perfect comic timing. The story behind the muhavra: Once upon a time, there was a proud and arrogant camel. He strutted around the village, convinced that no creature could be taller, stronger, or more important than him. Every other animal bowed, every human smiled nervously, and the camel’s ego swelled bigger with each passing day. One day, the camel’s owner decided it was time for...

1/31: Why I loved Pather Panchali (1955)

Pather Panchali (1955) Review | Satyajit Ray’s Poetic Debut Pather Panchali (1955): Satyajit Ray’s Poetic Debut Why on earth had I not watched any Satyajit Ray film till now? Puzzles me. But I'm setting out to watch every film made by the great man. Pather Panchali is my kind of cinema. Simple, yet complex. Subtle, yet bold. Rambling, yet assertive. The story is quite loose and banal, but it is the telling of the story that makes an impact. What drew me to the film is the play of characters, and the attention to detail. Your heart goes out to each of the pivotal characters — Sarbajaya , the forced matriarch; Durga , the dreamy daughter; Apu , the boy turning into a man; and Indir , the penniless beggar. Each of them tells their own story, not through words, but through their eyes and body language. Usually, in a film, you can make out the star of the show, but you can'...

Nuggets of Sholay: Three - Loha Garam Hai, Maardo Hathoda

Nuggets of Sholay #3: Loha Garam Hai, Maar Do Hathoda | Sholay Proverb Explained Nuggets of Sholay — Three: Loha Garam Hai (लोहा गरम है, मार दो हथौड़ा) The third nugget in the Nuggets of Sholay series is another muhavra — and a shining example of Salim–Javed’s brilliant writing. Muhavra: Loha Garam Hai, Maar Do Hathoda literally means “Strike while the iron is hot.” Timing is everything — the English equivalent would be “Seize the moment.” In the film, the line appears around 1h 49m . Girija from Pipri brings word that Gabbar’s nomadic arms suppliers — Hira aur uske saathi — have been spotted nearby. Thakur predicts Gabbar’s next move and says, “ Loha garam hai, maar do hathoda. ” The phrase originates from the craft of the lohar (blacksmith) — who must strike the iron while it’s red-hot. Once it cools, it loses its shape. The brilliance of Salim–Javed Why Thakur uses it: He senses the perfect timing. Who bri...