After Hyderabad and Kolkata: Why India Is Asking What Makes a Rapist
After Hyderabad and Kolkata: What Makes a Rapist?
With the rape and murder of the Hyderabad veterinarian still raw in public memory, and more recently the horrific incident at Kolkata’s RG Kar Medical College, it feels like the country’s collective patience has snapped.
Each case follows a depressingly familiar pattern: outrage, protests, demands for instant justice, and a brief political scramble—until the next atrocity replaces it.
A Society on the Edge
In the aftermath of these crimes, there are always reports of mobs attempting to lynch the accused, parading them, or demanding extrajudicial punishment. It is not difficult to understand the rage. When justice appears slow, abstract, or performative, people begin to believe that fear is the only deterrent left.
If the state cannot enforce a punishment that the average offender genuinely fears, there is a real danger that citizens will begin to take matters into their own hands—not out of cruelty, but out of despair.
The Question We Avoid
But beyond punishment lies a far more uncomfortable question—one that rarely gets sustained attention.
What makes a rapist?
And more disturbingly, what makes a child rapist? Or a rapist who then goes on to murder?
These are not rhetorical questions. They are urgent ones.
Looking at Men Differently
There is an insidious psychological toll these crimes take on society. Walking through public spaces, one begins to look at men differently—wondering, irrationally yet irresistibly, whether the person standing next to you is capable of such violence.
When a man looks at a four-year-old child, does he not see a child? What kind of cognitive or moral collapse allows an infant to be sexualised? Does the brain rot to such an extent, or was it never wired correctly to begin with?
From Violence to Murder
And what pushes a rapist to murder? Is it fear of being identified? A complete absence of empathy? Or the knowledge—conscious or otherwise—that consequences are negotiable?
Each explanation is horrifying in its own way.
Prevention, Not Just Punishment
The law is necessary. Severe punishment may even be justified. But punishment only reacts—it does not prevent.
So what do we do to prevent this violence from occurring in the first place?
Do we examine early childhood trauma? Pornography exposure? Toxic masculinity? Policing failures? Judicial delays? Cultural silence around consent?
Or do we continue oscillating between outrage and amnesia?
Seeking Answers
Cases like Hyderabad and Kolkata force us to confront a truth we would rather avoid: a society that only discusses punishment after the fact has already failed.
I don’t have answers. But I am seeking them—because until we do, this cycle will continue, and the names of cities will keep changing.
What can we do to prevent it? A question with multiple possible answers.. A "woman" is not a piece of meat.. A "girl child" is not a toy to be played with.. "Consent", a concept so alien to most of the men in this so called beautiful country.. A country with ginourmous potential to be the best in the world and yet what are we known for? RAPE! A rotten action, done by rotten people with absolutely no sense of humanity. YES ,women of this country feel unsafe at ALL times and what can we do about that? The bare minimum. Why?.. Again, a question with multiple possible answers..
Rapes have always been there. It gets now reported and shakes up conscious of civilised world. Only solution is tough law, speedy disposal if cases and high conviction rate. Media is happy reporting a rape and chooses to ignore convictions. We must instill a fear of conviction. Law and it's enforcement is the only civilised way of reducing the heinous crime
Ohmygosh. A few days after I published this, two things happened.
a) Law was taken into own hands by the police (https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/all-4-hyderabad-vet-rape-murder-accused-killed-in-police-encounter-1625670-2019-12-06)
and
b) A woman bravely interviewed 100 convicted rapists and had a few initial observations (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/09/11/a-woman-interviewed-100-convicted-rapists-in-india-this-is-what-she-learned/)
Pather Panchali (1955) Review | Satyajit Ray’s Poetic Debut Pather Panchali (1955): Satyajit Ray’s Poetic Debut Why on earth had I not watched any Satyajit Ray film till now? Puzzles me. But I'm setting out to watch every film made by the great man. Pather Panchali is my kind of cinema. Simple, yet complex. Subtle, yet bold. Rambling, yet assertive. The story is quite loose and banal, but it is the telling of the story that makes an impact. What drew me to the film is the play of characters, and the attention to detail. Your heart goes out to each of the pivotal characters — Sarbajaya , the forced matriarch; Durga , the dreamy daughter; Apu , the boy turning into a man; and Indir , the penniless beggar. Each of them tells their own story, not through words, but through their eyes and body language. Usually, in a film, you can make out the star of the show, but you can'...
Nuggets of Sholay #1: One Oont Pahad Ke Neeche Nuggets of Sholay #1: One Oont Pahad Ke Neeche (ओँट पहाड़ के नीचे) I must confess, starting this series of Nuggets of Sholay has been immensely joyful. Every line I researched, every scene I analyzed, brought me closer to the genius of Salim–Javed. Muhavra: One Oont Pahad Ke Neeche (ओँट पहाड़ के नीचे) This proverb literally means “a camel under a mountain,” describing something impossible or absurd. In Sholay , this phrase was delivered with perfect comic timing. The story behind the muhavra: Once upon a time, there was a proud and arrogant camel. He strutted around the village, convinced that no creature could be taller, stronger, or more important than him. Every other animal bowed, every human smiled nervously, and the camel’s ego swelled bigger with each passing day. One day, the camel’s owner decided it was time for...
Mahanagar (1963): A Simple Woman in a Big City | Sachit Murthy Mahanagar (1963): Satyajit Ray’s Quiet Revolt Satyajit Ray returns to black and white after Kanchenjunga with Mahanagar in 1963. Man, this fellow could churn out films at an astonishing pace. And he returns with a bang. This one is an absolute classic. Mahanagar is the story of Arati Mazumdar, played by Madhabi Mukherjee . A simple housewife in an orthodox household, the film charts Arati’s journey—from being gently hemmed in by domestic expectations to stepping out into the world to financially support her family, and finally to standing up to injustice, even at the cost of upsetting the very financial applecart that sustains them. Madhabi Mukherjee as Arati Mazumdar — a woman whose revolution is ethical, not theatrical. The film makes a strong statement on the value of women in society, and not just through Arati. Ray spreads this id...
Sachit Murthy — Writing on Cinema, Cricket, Travel, and Life in India
This blog brings together essays, reviews, and observations on cinema, sport, travel, and everyday life in India. It moves between detailed writing on Indian and world cinema, reflections on cricket as culture and memory, travel notes from cities and small towns, and personal pieces shaped by living and working in contemporary India.
Film writing on the blog ranges from close readings of classic and modern films to broader reflections on performance, narrative, and form. Cricket appears not as statistics or news, but as lived experience — a shared language of time, obsession, and belonging. Travel pieces pay attention to place, atmosphere, and the small details that define movement and return.
Underlying these varied subjects is a consistent interest in observation: how people speak, perform, remember, and negotiate their inner and public lives. The author’s background as a stage and screen actor, writer, and voice artist informs the attention to rhythm, silence, and point of view across the writing.
The blog is intended for readers who enjoy reflective, unhurried writing — pieces that sit somewhere between criticism, travelogue, and personal essay.
Comments
Patriarchy has long and deep legs, these are the ugliest manifestation. I think the fact that women are existing to please men gives them permission.
Such an important conversation, we need to have more of these
A "woman" is not a piece of meat.. A "girl child" is not a toy to be played with.. "Consent", a concept so alien to most of the men in this so called beautiful country.. A country with ginourmous potential to be the best in the world and yet what are we known for? RAPE! A rotten action, done by rotten people with absolutely no sense of humanity. YES ,women of this country feel unsafe at ALL times and what can we do about that? The bare minimum. Why?.. Again, a question with multiple possible answers..
a) Law was taken into own hands by the police (https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/all-4-hyderabad-vet-rape-murder-accused-killed-in-police-encounter-1625670-2019-12-06)
and
b) A woman bravely interviewed 100 convicted rapists and had a few initial observations (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/09/11/a-woman-interviewed-100-convicted-rapists-in-india-this-is-what-she-learned/)