Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from February, 2012

Chemical castration

Chemical Castration: Humane Punishment or Moral Evasion? Chemical Castration: Humane Punishment or Moral Evasion? I came across this phrase in yesterday’s newspaper. Apparently, it is an alternative, “humane” method of castration. Wikipedia describes it as a chemical treatment that reduces sexual drive or libido. The Language Already Raises Questions I have two immediate issues with this description. The first is the word “treatment.” Treatment implies reversibility. Once stopped, the recipient can potentially regain what was suppressed. The second is the word “reduces.” Reduction is not elimination. It leaves room — however small — for recurrence. When the punishment in question is meant to address crimes involving minors and infants, this distinction is not semantic. It is fundamental. Punishment, Not Rehabilitation The intent behind castration, in such cases, is not therapy. It is not reform. It is punishment — aimed at ensurin...